Structuring a concise response
I want to start by acknowledging the quote and providing my quick take: historically, shot-stopping correlates more with goals prevented, while distribution aids build-up. The core KPI is PSxG +/-. For Skorupski, he has good reflexes but average passing under pressure, and Bologna under Motta last season focused on build-up, though their keeper wasn't a sweeper like Ederson.
Then, I’ll ask the user what they want: translation, analysis, data, or comparisons with modern sweeper-keeper trends. I could offer to pull stats too, but I'd need to be careful with accuracy.Proposing options for the user
Since I haven’t been told the sandbox configuration yet, I’ll default to workspace-write and keep the network disabled for now. I won’t attempt network access, but I can ask the user if they want data. They haven't made a specific request yet, but I can suggest some options:

- Translation to English
- Extended interpretation of modern goalkeeper skills
- Data comparison of Skorupski vs. Serie A averages over the last two seasons
- Training tips for amateur goalkeepers on improving saves and footwork
- Comparative analysis of styles between Ederson, Ter Stegen, and Onana
I’ll keep it friendly and concise.
这是他对门将优先级的经典观点:先把门守住,再谈脚下组织。你想要我做哪种内容?
- 翻译成英文
- 简短解读:现代门将“扑救 vs 脚下”的权重与趋势
- 数据对比:斯科鲁普斯基近两季的扑救指标与脚下数据(PSxG±、扑救率、传球成功率等)
- 业余/青训训练建议:如何先提升扑救,再补脚下
- 案例比较:与埃德森、特尔施特根、奥纳纳等不同风格门将对照分析
